Assignment: Makeup: Deforestation in the Amazon Simulation

WORLD HISTORY-B
2023-02-16T04:12:59Z

Due: Feb 17, 2023 by 11:59pm

**NOTE** You only need to complete this in two situations

1. If you were absent 2/16

2. If you were present on 2/16, but were not assigned a group due to absences earlier in the simulation

If you were absent on 2/16, answer the following questions with 4 sentences each to make up your participation points . Modified: 2 sentences each

1. Why deforestation in the Amazon Rainforest significant to US policy and national security?

2. Recommend and justify YOUR preferred policy option or options.

3. Is your opinion similar or different to the opinion of your group/government agency?

If you were present on 2/16 but were an newspaper reporter (not assigned a group), write a 500+ word newspaper article about the simulation. Modified: 250 words

Summary of the different groups' policy position

Description of the debate/conversation

The end conclusion of the meeting

Your opinions on the simulation from the perspective of a newspaper writer. For example, was the meeting effective, or could it have gone better? Do you agree with the outcome? Was there something obvious you think the council should have talked about but they did not?

**NOTE** You only need to complete this in two situations

1. If you were absent 2/16

2. If you were present on 2/16, but were not assigned a group due to absences earlier in the simulation

If you were absent on 2/16, answer the following questions with 4 sentences each to make up your participation points . Modified: 2 sentences each

1. Why deforestation in the Amazon Rainforest significant to US policy and national security?

2. Recommend and justify YOUR preferred policy option or options.

3. Is your opinion similar or different to the opinion of your group/government agency?

If you were present on 2/16 but were an newspaper reporter (not assigned a group), write a 500+ word newspaper article about the simulation. Modified: 250 words

Summary of the different groups' policy position

Description of the debate/conversation

The end conclusion of the meeting

Your opinions on the simulation from the perspective of a newspaper writer. For example, was the meeting effective, or could it have gone better? Do you agree with the outcome? Was there something obvious you think the council should have talked about but they did not?